Odigooogle Postado 17 de março de 2009 Denunciar Compartilhar Postado 17 de março de 2009 Duelo de gigantes no mundo dos semicondutores, Intel acusa a AMD de violar cláusula de um contrato secreto firmado entre ambas em 2001. A coisa tá feia... Intel Accuses AMD of Cross-License Breach. Intel Believes AMD Breaches Cross-License Pact [03/16/2009 11:48 AM] by Anton Shilov Intel Corp. on Monday disclosed that the company has notified Advanced Micro Devices that it believes AMD has breached a 2001 patent cross-license agreement with Intel. "Intellectual property is a cornerstone of Intel's technology leadership and for more than 30 years, the company has believed in the strategic importance of licensing intellectual property in exchange for fair value. However AMD cannot unilaterally extend Intel's licensing rights to a third party without Intel's consent," said Bruce Sewell, senior vice president and general counsel for Intel. Intel believes that Globalfoundries, manufacturing joint venture between AMD and Advanced Technology Investment Company, is not a subsidiary under terms of the agreement and is therefore not licensed under the 2001 patent cross-license agreement. Intel also said the structure of the deal between AMD and ATIC breaches a confidential portion of that agreement. Intel has asked AMD to make the relevant portion of the agreement public, but so far AMD has declined to do so. AMD's breach could result in the loss of licenses and rights granted to AMD by Intel under the agreement. "We have attempted to address our concerns with AMD without success since October. We are willing to find a resolution but at the same time we have an obligation to our stockholders to protect the billions of dollars we've invested in intellectual property," Mr. Sewell added. Under terms of the license agreement the notification to AMD means the parties will attempt to resolve the dispute through mediation. In response to the notification AMD claimed Intel breached the agreement by notifying AMD of its breach. Intel believes that position is inconsistent with the dispute resolution process outlined in the original agreement. Fonte: http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/display/2...nse_Breach.html Citar Link para o comentário Compartilhar em outros sites More sharing options...
cauanebs Postado 17 de março de 2009 Denunciar Compartilhar Postado 17 de março de 2009 Let the party begin! haha Citar Link para o comentário Compartilhar em outros sites More sharing options...
fredlima Postado 17 de março de 2009 Denunciar Compartilhar Postado 17 de março de 2009 (editado) 1....2....3....fight! Mas a microsoft ganha...tem experiência com Fatalities, olha só... http://www.fredlima.com.br/downloads/fatal.jpg Editado 17 de março de 2009 por fredlima Citar Link para o comentário Compartilhar em outros sites More sharing options...
Odigooogle Postado 18 de março de 2009 Autor Denunciar Compartilhar Postado 18 de março de 2009 1....2....3....fight!Mas a microsoft ganha...tem experiência com Fatalities, olha só... http://www.fredlima.com.br/downloads/fatal.jpg Kkkkk... você não perde uma, Fred. Citar Link para o comentário Compartilhar em outros sites More sharing options...
fredlima Postado 18 de março de 2009 Denunciar Compartilhar Postado 18 de março de 2009 hehehehe.....é o velho e engraçado (quando acontece com os outros, é claro) OWNED! Citar Link para o comentário Compartilhar em outros sites More sharing options...
Posts Recomendados
Participe do debate
Você pode postar agora e se registrar depois. Se você tem uma conta, entre agora para postar com ela.